zlacker

[return to "U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel"]
1. sobiol+da[view] [source] 2025-08-22 22:04:07
>>giveme+(OP)
Ironic, Western politicians thought opening up to trade with China would lead to it adopting a Western model of government. Instead it's lead to the USA adopting the Chinese one.
◧◩
2. robotn+sd[view] [source] 2025-08-22 22:23:33
>>sobiol+da
It somewhat makes sense in terms of industries which are deemed strategically important. Intel needs to start thinking long term instead of short term profits.
◧◩◪
3. JackYo+aj[view] [source] 2025-08-22 22:59:37
>>robotn+sd
if someone believes this, they should buy intel and just do it outright! But no one does because it's not as easy as "just think long term" - if it were, berkshire has the liquid money to buy intel several times over.
◧◩◪◨
4. Neverm+3n[view] [source] 2025-08-22 23:27:28
>>JackYo+aj
A large new powerful shareholder come in supporting long term thinking does make a difference.

Public shareholders are generally short term motivated.

One clear reason it doesn't make as much sense to Buffet is he wouldn't get the national security hedge that made the stock a buy for the government.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Paradi+7n3[view] [source] 2025-08-24 09:22:19
>>Neverm+3n
I wouldn't call those two years till the next elections long term.
[go to top]