zlacker

[return to "U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel"]
1. jjcm+Ef[view] [source] 2025-08-22 22:36:27
>>giveme+(OP)
In general I would rather the government take a stake in corporations they're bailing out. I think the "too big to fail" bailouts in the past should have come with more of a cost for the business, so on one hand I'm glad this is finally happening.

On the other hand, I wish it were a more formalized process rather than this politicized "our president made a deal to save america!" / "Intel is back and the government is investing BUY INTEL SHARES" media event. These things should follow a strict set of rules and processes so investors and companies know what to expect. These kind of deals should be boring, not a media event.

◧◩
2. ants_e+yv[view] [source] 2025-08-23 00:33:47
>>jjcm+Ef
They're converting a grant, so Intel is worse off due to this move.

The only real benefit I can see is it looks more revenue neutral because the government getting something of value and Trump is unpopular for spending so much money on unfunded tax cuts.

◧◩◪
3. electr+gT[view] [source] 2025-08-23 04:36:35
>>ants_e+yv
It is going to help ensure that Intel doesn’t just waste the $8.9B they are getting
[go to top]