zlacker

>>miohta+(OP)
Didn't Biden sign a 280 billion dollar Intel subsidy for chip-making? I mean as far as I can tell we already do it, this isn't a fantasy, and there's no reason to think we can't absorb more of the market. I can't read the article but it seems more political than economic, judging from the first paragraph

>>guywit+N1
You should consider reading the article: https://archive.ph/h1RrC

And no, Biden didn't sign a "280 billion dollar Intel subsidy for chip-making." If you're talking about the CHIPS and Science Act, that number is overall authorized funding for many things. Intel has received ~10b until now.

>>interm+s3
> that number is overall authorized funding for many things. Intel has received ~10b until now.

They were promised $10B. They had received only about $2B.