zlacker

[return to "Go is still not good"]
1. Skepti+OS[view] [source] 2025-08-22 15:37:32
>>ustad+(OP)
Go has its fair share of flaws but I still think it hits a sweet spot that no other server side language provides.

It’s faster than Node or Python, with a better type system than either. It’s got a much easier learning curve than Rust. It has a good stdlib and tooling. Simple syntax with usually only one way to do things. Error handling has its problems but I still prefer it over Node, where a catch clause might receive just about anything as an “error”.

Am I missing a language that does this too or more? I’m not a Go fanatic at all, mostly written Node for backends in my career, but I’ve been exploring Go lately.

◧◩
2. viccis+Wb1[view] [source] 2025-08-22 17:14:43
>>Skepti+OS
>with a better type system than either

Given Python's substantial improvements recently, I would put it far ahead of the structural typing done in Go, personally.

◧◩◪
3. slippe+6M1[view] [source] 2025-08-22 20:19:04
>>viccis+Wb1
Python with a library like Pydantic isn't bad—I wouldn't rate base Python as being near Go's level, at all, though you can get it up to something non-painful with libraries.

Go (and lots of other languages...) wreck it on dependency management and deployment, though. :-/ As the saying goes, "it was easier to invent Docker than fix Python's tooling".

[go to top]