Go is still not good

>>ustad+(OP)
As usual, lets revisit something that Pascal could do in 1976,

    type

    StatusCodes = (Success, Ongoing, Done)

Go in 2025,

    type StatusCodes int

    const (
        Success StatusCodes = iota
        Ongoing
        Done
    )

>>pjmlp+bh
If Pascal doesn't have required exhaustive pattern matching, it's no better than Go or C# in this regard.

>>jen20+O81
Go is the one being discussed as ignoring history.

C# thankfully was designed by someone that appreciates type systems, maybe you should revisit it.

>>pjmlp+yc1
Not enough to add sum types or exhaustive pattern matching... now F# - that was appreciated by someone that appreciates type systems.

zlacker