zlacker

[return to "Go is still not good"]
1. figmer+Ta[view] [source] 2025-08-22 11:24:20
>>ustad+(OP)
Has Go become the new PHP? Every now and then I see an article complaining about Go's shortcomings.
◧◩
2. gianca+kb[view] [source] 2025-08-22 11:28:22
>>figmer+Ta
No, this has been the case as long as Go has been around, then you look and its some C or C++ developer with specific needs, thats okay, its not for everyone.
◧◩◪
3. ginko+Lb[view] [source] 2025-08-22 11:32:06
>>gianca+kb
Go was announced as a replacement for C & C++ so I think it's reasonable to compare it to that.
◧◩◪◨
4. Matl+jd[view] [source] 2025-08-22 11:43:36
>>ginko+Lb
It was intended as a as a replacement for C & C++ for Google's use case of network services btw.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. pjmlp+Sj[view] [source] 2025-08-22 12:28:56
>>Matl+jd
Not really, no one at other other than the original authors though of that, the authors had an issue with C++ compile times and were sponsored by their manager to work on this Go side project of theirs.

Google's networking services keep being writen in Java/Kotlin, C++, and nowadays Rust.

[go to top]