zlacker

[return to "AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions"]
1. philjo+o9[view] [source] 2025-08-21 19:43:36
>>freeto+(OP)
I like the pattern of including each prompt used to make a given PR, yes, I know that LLM's aren't deterministic, but it also gives context of the steps required to get to the end state.
◧◩
2. Fillig+OG[view] [source] 2025-08-21 23:05:09
>>philjo+o9
It's ridiculous and impractical, honestly. A single AI-generated PR would likely involve at least 10-20 prompts, interspersed with testing, manual edits to context / guideline files without which those prompts don't have the same effect, manual coding, and more. A screen recording would do better.
◧◩◪
3. asdff+nO[view] [source] 2025-08-22 00:06:03
>>Fillig+OG
Is there really no logging capability with these tools that would track all of that prompting/testing/editing/inputting?
◧◩◪◨
4. Fillig+JT[view] [source] 2025-08-22 01:02:27
>>asdff+nO
Sure, screen recorders exist.

And if contributions are that unwelcome, then it's better not to contribute. There has to be some baseline level of trust that the contributor is trying to do the right thing; I get enough spying from the corporations in my life.

[go to top]