>>benbre+(OP)
A few years ago, the Turing Test was universally seen as sufficient for identifying intelligence. Now we’re scouring the planet for obscure tests to make us feel superior again. One can argue that the Turing Test was not actually adequate for this purpose, but we should at least admit how far we have shifted the goalposts since then.
>>munchl+rf3
Would you consider that any current LLM is close to passing the Turing test?
If you think there's an LLM that can do so, I'd love to try it out! Even talking to the best models available today, it's disappointingly clear I'm talking to an LLM.