zlacker

>>amarch+(OP)
> The government also insists the tech is independently tested at the National Physical Laboratory, which found the underlying algorithm to be accurate and free of age, gender, or ethnicity-related bias.

I feel so much better! /sarcasm

How tone deaf can they be?

Whenever there are serious privacy concerns about how this sort of technology, you have a statement like attached. It doesn't address what people are worried about. They never directly address it.

>>extrai+Cp
Well there had been system with very high rates of false positives for certain ethnicities which if wide scale deployed would in effect be like systematic harassment of this people.

So it is a thing people which in general are okay with mass surveillance might worried about.

And convincing the people you have a chance to convince is much more useful the pointlessly trying to convince the people which anyway won't like what you do no matter what you say.

>>dathin+R41
It reads more like something to appease some media outlets and activist groups than the general public.