zlacker

[return to "Online Safety Act – shutdowns and site blocks"]
1. b800h+W5[view] [source] 2025-08-13 07:45:19
>>azalem+(OP)
What's frustrating me about this is that theoretically this list should include every MUD and BBS, if they don't want to get in trouble. It's a horrible law, which forces people into the pockets of the largest sites which can afford to do the age verification.

Speaking as a Brit, I wish Wikipedia would just go black for the UK. That might focus some minds.

◧◩
2. cs02rm+B7[view] [source] 2025-08-13 08:03:20
>>b800h+W5
> Speaking as a Brit, I wish Wikipedia would just go black for the UK. That might focus some minds.

Likewise. People (organisations/companies), as far as possible, shouldn't be pandering to this stuff, it's not the answer, it doesn't help them or us.

◧◩◪
3. dabeee+Vf[view] [source] 2025-08-13 09:21:33
>>cs02rm+B7
What is the answer?
◧◩◪◨
4. cs02rm+eh[view] [source] 2025-08-13 09:35:28
>>dabeee+Vf
To online safety for children? The same as offline safety; parenting and education. There's not much money in those though.

https://x.com/moo9000/status/1950866445186818209

[go to top]