zlacker

[return to "Flock Now Using AI to Report to Police If Our Movement Patterns Are "Suspicious""]
1. Manuel+cd[view] [source] 2025-08-11 04:50:00
>>cyberp+(OP)
Courts have previously held that heuristics based determinations are not sufficient to serve as probable cause. E.g. "predictive policing" technologies can be used for e.g. scheduling officers to different areas, but aren't valid to conduct a search.

If this feature is used to make an arrest, there's a good chance the case would be thrown out.

◧◩
2. garbag+Bd[view] [source] 2025-08-11 04:57:50
>>Manuel+cd
Why would the police even inform you that flock was used?
◧◩◪
3. dqv+KC[view] [source] 2025-08-11 09:39:22
>>garbag+Bd
Why? Because the prosecutor doesn't want all their work to go to waste because they didn't disclose Brady evidence. Even if they successfully argue that Officer Flock's reporting isn't exculpatory, they still have to do extra work to respond to a Brady motion for a case that already got a conviction.
◧◩◪◨
4. mapt+SR[view] [source] 2025-08-11 12:16:50
>>dqv+KC
In cases of parallel construction of evidence, is the prosecution still obligated to disclose everything to the defense in discovery? Is the tree from which the Fruit is picked only obscured from the jury, or from the defense as well?
[go to top]