zlacker

[return to "Do not download the app, use the website"]
1. rustys+Fg[view] [source] 2025-07-26 00:19:04
>>foxfir+(OP)
I cannot agree more and this has always been a pet peeve of mine.

Most native apps are some half gig large where even the heaviest website is a few mb. They dont let you highlight text and have other bizarre design choices. Even worse, they request importing contacts list which isnt even an option on the web.

Native apps could be butter but more often than not they are like margarine. Smooth, oily, and not good for you.

◧◩
2. ljm+tp[view] [source] 2025-07-26 01:58:28
>>rustys+Fg
A lot of native apps are just wrappers around a JS context with a few bridges into native APIs and they are pure data grabs.

Reddit always asks you to use its native app, for example. Why the fuck would I care so much about Reddit that I want it outside of my browser? Same goes for any other website.

◧◩◪
3. spauld+hq[view] [source] 2025-07-26 02:08:42
>>ljm+tp
Reddit is one of the cases where a native app makes sense. Some of the 3rd party Reddit apps were great.

But I'll eat my hat before I'll install Reddit's own app. Reddit killing off 3rd party apps is why I post here and not there.

◧◩◪◨
4. Gigach+5t[view] [source] 2025-07-26 02:42:59
>>spauld+hq
How does an app for Reddit make sense? It’s an image and text platform. There’s no weird hardware apis required.

Native apps make sense when you need to tap in to platform specific features like the Lidar api and such. They don’t make any sense for most websites.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. jasonj+dw[view] [source] 2025-07-26 03:22:43
>>Gigach+5t
The 3rd party Reddit apps made an effort to be more 'native', and actually used native UI elements to make rendering and interactions faster than the web page could.

WAAAAAY too often the 1st party native app is exactly what the other poster said: a browser context with access to some local native API's in order to hoover more data about the user. It is rare that a first-party app actually has some effort put into it to be a quality app. Is in fact so rare, that the sites that actually put in the effort suffer because folks can't believe that a native app for a site could actually be better or worth it.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. ghostp+Cw[view] [source] 2025-07-26 03:28:50
>>jasonj+dw
I think the parent's point was that an app for reddit only makes sense because they deliberately don't add the features you like to the mobile site. There's no reason those features couldn't work perfectly well in a browser, they just choose not to (and to kill off third party apps).
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. DrewAD+7F[view] [source] 2025-07-26 05:32:18
>>ghostp+Cw
If Figma runs perfectly well in a web browser, Reddit can do the same. It was built for and evolved almost entirely within the browser, like many other Internet forums. Pure data grab.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. zxexz+1I[view] [source] 2025-07-26 06:10:08
>>DrewAD+7F
Reddit runs well IMO if you go to old.reddit.com. The mobile site is borderline useless, presumably intentionally.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. troupo+6P[view] [source] 2025-07-26 07:45:31
>>zxexz+1I
According to Reddit's "Staff Platform Engineer (Web Platform Team)":

--- start quote ---

Old Reddit has the advantage of being pretty much static non-interactive content. No video, tiny thumbnails, and barely any JS or styling. Some people like this and some don't, but the end result is a very lean website that performs well out of the box.

https://x.com/jimsimon_/status/1841087335414280571

Suffice to say, I'm on the frontend perf team and we're acutely aware of these problems

https://x.com/jimsimon_/status/1841092341991403974

--- end quote ---

This was in October 2024.

Which is of course a bunch of bullshit when you consider that Reddit's backend returns most data in under 400ms, and it takes Reddit frontend 3+ seconds to render it

It could be that they are just incompetent.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦
10. cellul+gYf[view] [source] 2025-07-31 21:34:33
>>troupo+6P
Based on how universally horrible their video playback performance is (even in the iOS app), I can only assume incompetence.
[go to top]