zlacker

[return to "The U.K. closed a tax loophole for the global rich, now they're fleeing"]
1. bashto+T2[view] [source] 2025-07-19 22:52:15
>>fortra+(OP)
The British government closed this loophole because it's politically easier than the strategy which is actually needed: properly taxing assets.

This is much harder to evade - if you own most of Mayfair, you can't just move your assets elsewhere - they are very clearly tied to the location.

Of course, this would mean taxing powerful aristocrats, including the royal family. With their large majority, the British government had the opportunity to do this, but decided to take an easier path. The reason why this path was easier is now becoming clear to them.

◧◩
2. monero+m5[view] [source] 2025-07-19 23:10:42
>>bashto+T2
The real solution to the UK’s stagnation is accepting the truly politically difficult truth - the UK is getting poorer, year after year. The empire is long dead and gone, and their number 1 growth company and success story of the last decade is OnlyFans, a global smut purveyor.

The UK needs to radically reduce its social safety net and simultaneously cut taxes, at least for new companies and small businesses. The only way out is real, sustained, long term growth and innovation. Stealing ever more of a shrinking pie is already running out of steam.

◧◩◪
3. silver+36[view] [source] 2025-07-19 23:18:09
>>monero+m5
> The UK needs to radically reduce its social safety net and simultaneously cut taxes, at least for new companies and small businesses. The only way out is real, sustained, long term growth and innovation. Stealing ever more of a shrinking pie is already running out of steam.

I was under the impression they had done that already.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_aust...

Though one can't help but think it wont be radical enough for conservatives until we simply dispose of those unable to work through some dystopic mechanism or other.

◧◩◪◨
4. adamma+1U[view] [source] 2025-07-20 09:53:34
>>silver+36
This was a long time ago. Since then we've been running full speed in the opposite direction.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. ojno+L82[view] [source] 2025-07-20 19:01:12
>>adamma+1U
(from the linked Wikipedia article)

> Coalition and Conservative governments in office from 2010 to 2019 used the term, and it was applied again by many observers to describe Conservative Party policies from 2021 to 2024, during the cost of living crisis.

2024, last year, is "a long time ago"?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. adamma+bYk[view] [source] 2025-07-27 11:48:27
>>ojno+L82
People use terms, they're often wrong. The last few years since 2019 we've been breaking ever greater records on state spending and borrowing, this is not austerity.
[go to top]