zlacker

[return to "Cops say criminals use a Google Pixel with GrapheneOS – I say that's freedom"]
1. Twey+w4[view] [source] 2025-07-23 13:45:20
>>pabs3+(OP)
I tried to read this article on digital privacy but after five minutes spent unticking boxes allowing my usage data to be sent to an augean list of data collectors I gave up and left.
◧◩
2. gruez+d8[view] [source] 2025-07-23 14:09:16
>>Twey+w4
> Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

◧◩◪
3. nilamo+v8[view] [source] 2025-07-23 14:10:52
>>gruez+d8
An article being inaccessible or illegible counts as tangential?
◧◩◪◨
4. dang+tn1[view] [source] 2025-07-23 21:26:24
>>nilamo+v8
Yes, it's tangential in the sense that we're using the word there: it veers in a different direction from the article.

If an article is truly inaccessible or illegible, then it shouldn't be on HN. But if it's readable-albeit-with-annoyances, then it belongs here if (and only if) the content is sufficiently interesting, irrespective of annoyances. In that case we want the comments to focus on the interesting content.

Not that annoyances aren't annoying—they are, and they annoy us too. But the cost of having comments about them is much higher than the benefit, especially because they're so repetitive. Annoyance comments also tend to get stuck at the top of the thread, accumulating upvotes and choking out more interesting discussion.

[go to top]