zlacker

>>pabs3+(OP)
Everyone is commenting as if this is an attack on privacy. Read the article, I might have missed it, but I saw literally nothing on this. The main point is that police are profiling people using Pixel phones. Nothing about making it illegal, or trying to remove encryption.

Look, I literally have a Pixel phone running Mullvad. I care about privacy. But everyone here is reading the headline and arguing against a strawman.

This should be a discussion on how valid it is for police to profile people. Or maybe if it's actually true that drug dealers are using GrapheneOS. Europe _is_ attacking encryption and privacy. But this is not it.

>>silver+He
Is disparagement of GrapheneOS good or bad for privacy?

>>walter+1g
Arguments shouldn't be soldiers[1]. In fact, this I'd say this is harmful to privacy.

If you start caring more about how it supports your side rather than the truth, you're playing politics. And in that battlefield you'll lose to eurocrats.

- [1] https://www.lesswrong.com/w/arguments-as-soldiers