zlacker

[return to "Anthropic cut up millions of used books, and downloaded 7M pirated ones – judge"]
1. bgwalt+pE[view] [source] 2025-07-07 14:38:17
>>pyman+(OP)
Here is how individuals are treated for massive copyright infringement:

https://investors.autodesk.com/news-releases/news-release-de...

◧◩
2. chouro+cL[view] [source] 2025-07-07 15:15:38
>>bgwalt+pE
copyright is not the same as piracy
◧◩◪
3. achier+fN[view] [source] 2025-07-07 15:29:05
>>chouro+cL
Can you explain why? What makes them categorically different or at the very least why is "piracy" quantitatively worse than 'just' copyright violation?
◧◩◪◨
4. Nasrud+jq6[view] [source] 2025-07-09 17:59:43
>>achier+fN
The simplest way to put I can think of is a silly set of two hypotheticals.

Imagine mer-people or aliens existed and started armed raiding marine shipping. That would be would be a hostile act of war. Declaring war on the mer-people would be a shame but justifiable in self-defense.

Imagine instead they were decrypting communications and using it to decipher and view our content. The other would basically be acceptable as part of a first contact protocol and exploration as it involves trying to figure out the basics of communication protocols of an 'alien' species. Declaring war on them in response would be a vastly disproportionate act of aggression for violating laws that they had no way of knowing they were subject to and literally could not possibly know.

[go to top]