zlacker

[return to "Anthropic cut up millions of used books, and downloaded 7M pirated ones – judge"]
1. dehrma+DS[view] [source] 2025-07-07 16:02:04
>>pyman+(OP)
The important parts:

> Alsup ruled that Anthropic's use of copyrighted books to train its AI models was "exceedingly transformative" and qualified as fair use

> "All Anthropic did was replace the print copies it had purchased for its central library with more convenient space-saving and searchable digital copies for its central library — without adding new copies, creating new works, or redistributing existing copies"

It was always somewhat obvious that pirating a library would be copyright infringement. The interesting findings here are that scanning and digitizing a library for internal use is OK, and using it to train models is fair use.

◧◩
2. francz+3v1[view] [source] 2025-07-07 20:01:51
>>dehrma+DS
Is fruit of the poisonous tree rule applicable here?
◧◩◪
3. gruez+z72[view] [source] 2025-07-08 02:42:27
>>francz+3v1
That's only really applicable to evidence in criminal cases obtained by the government. No such doctrine exists for civil cases, for instance. It doesn't even bar the government from using evidence that others have collected illegally of their own volition.
[go to top]