zlacker

>>pyman+(OP)
Every time an article like this surfaces, it always seems like the majority of tech folks believe that training AI on copyrighted material is NOT fair use, but the legal industry disagrees.

Which of the following are true?

(a) the legal industry is susceptible to influence and corruption

(b) engineers don't understand how to legally interpret legal text

(c) AI tech is new, and judges aren't technically qualified to decide these scenarios

Most likely option is C, as we've seen this pattern many times before.

>>platun+p81
If I allegedly train off of your training, which was trained off of copyrighted content under fair use, we're good right?

Just asking for a friend who's into this sort of thing.