zlacker

>>zczc+(OP)
One random cop makes one ignorant statement and now all "cops in Spain" think something.

>>15155+n2
The headline is exaggerated to make the cops sound like idiots. If they suspect someone might be a drug dealer (fair - it's a clue), that's very different from thinking they "must" be a drug dealer.

>>skybri+fi
Your characterization is under-exaggerated to make this problem sound normal. It's not.

> Every time we see a Google Pixel, we suspect it might belong to a drug dealer

Being a Pixel or GrapheneOS user should never be a "clue" of criminality. It should never result in police detaining you or rummaging through your phone. Any police that acts in this way is indeed an "idiot."

>>sorami+FL
It would be if they did that, and maybe they do, but the article doesn't say they do that. You've added your own assumption.