zlacker

[return to "A federal judge sides with Anthropic in lawsuit over training AI on books"]
1. 3PS+V1[view] [source] 2025-06-24 16:32:07
>>moose4+(OP)
Broadly summarizing.

This is OK and fair use: Training LLMs on copyrighted work, since it's transformative.

This is not OK and not fair use: pirating data, or creating a big repository of pirated data that isn't necessarily for AI training.

Overall seems like a pretty reasonable ruling?

◧◩
2. simmer+T4[view] [source] 2025-06-24 16:46:26
>>3PS+V1
Depends whether you actually agree its transformative
◧◩◪
3. lesuor+d6[view] [source] 2025-06-24 16:53:04
>>simmer+T4
For textual purposes it seems fairly transformative.

If you train a LLM on harry potter and ask it to generate a story that isn't harry potter then it's not a replacement.

However, if you train a model on stock imagery and use it to generate stock imagery then I think you'll run into an issue from the Warhol case.

◧◩◪◨
4. johnny+97[view] [source] 2025-06-24 16:58:33
>>lesuor+d6
The nature of how they store data makes it not okay in my books. You massage the data enough and you can generate something that seems infringement worthy.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. ranger+jf[view] [source] 2025-06-24 17:46:47
>>johnny+97
I wonder if https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number comes into play here.
[go to top]