zlacker

>>amrrs+(OP)
I've seen this too often, papers that ask questions they don't even bother to properly define.

> Are these models capable of generalizable reasoning, or are they leveraging different forms of pattern matching?

Define reasoning, define generalizable, define pattern matching.

For additional credits after you have done so, show humans are capable of what you just defined as generalizable reasoning.

>>nialv7+zE
In the context of this paper, I think "generalizable reasoning" means that finding a method to solve the puzzle and thus being able to execute the method on puzzle instances of arbitrary complexity.