zlacker

>>tablet+(OP)
It's been so much more rewarding playing with AI coding tools on my own than through the subtle and not so subtle nudges at work. The work AI tools are a walled garden, have a shitty interface, feel made to extract from me than to help me. In my personal stuff, downloading models, playing with them, the tooling, the interactions, it all been so much more rewarding to give me stable comfortable workflows I can rely on and that work with my brain.

The dialog around it is so adversarial it's been hard figuring out how to proceed until dedicating a lot of effort to diving into the field myself, alone, on my personal time and learned what's comfortable to use it on.

>>cobert+81
Exactly, seems much skepticism comes from only scratching the surface of what's possible.

>>j-bos+N1
Is there a term for “skeptics just haven’t used it enough” argument?

Because it frequently got rolled out in crypto-currency arguments too.

>>Fridge+q3
And Lisp arguments, and Haskell arguments, and FP in general arguments.

"You can't actually disagree with me. If you don't agree with me you just haven't thought it through/you don't know enough/you have bad motives." (Yeah, we need a better term for that.) You see this all the time, especially in politics but in many places. It's a cheap, lazy rhetorical move, designed to make the speaker feel better about holding their position without having to do the hard work of actually defending it.