zlacker

[return to "My AI skeptic friends are all nuts"]
1. jszymb+JM[view] [source] 2025-06-03 03:48:33
>>tablet+(OP)
The argument that I've heard against LLMs for code is that they create bugs that, by design, are very difficult to spot.

The LLM has one job, to make code that looks plausible. That's it. There's no logic gone into writing that bit of code. So the bugs often won't be like those a programmer makes. Instead, they can introduce a whole new class of bug that's way harder to debug.

◧◩
2. vansch+V31[view] [source] 2025-06-03 06:51:05
>>jszymb+JM
This is exactly what I wrote about when I wrote "Copilot Induced Crash" [0]

Funny story: when I first posted that and had a couple of thousand readers, I had many comments of the type "you should just read the code carefully on review", but _nobody_ pointed out the fact that the opening example (the so called "right code") had the exact same problem as described in the article, proving exactly what you just said: it's hard to spot problems that are caused by plausibility machines.

[0] https://www.bugsink.com/blog/copilot-induced-crash/

◧◩◪
3. okanat+9n2[view] [source] 2025-06-03 17:05:17
>>vansch+V31
If it crashes, you are very lucky.

AI generated code will fuck up so many lives. The post office software in the UK did it without AI. I cannot imagine the way and the number of lives will be ruined since some consultancy vibe coded some government system. I might come to appreciate the German bureaucracy and backwardness.

[go to top]