zlacker

>>gregor+(OP)
Hello Cloudflare, impressive result, I did not think things were this advanced.

Still, legal question where I'd like to be wrong: AFAIK (and IANAL) if I use AI to generate images, I can't attach copyright to it.

But the code here is clearly copyrighted to you.

Is that possible because you manually modify the code?

How does it work in examples like this one where you try to have close to all code generated by AI?

>>Luker8+v52
I am also not a lawyer, but I believe the law here is yet to be fully settled. Here in the US, there have been lower-court rulings but surely it will go to the supreme court.

There are parts of the library that I did write by hand, which are presumably copyright Cloudflare either way. As for whether the AI-generated parts are, I guess we'll see.

But given the thing is MIT-licensed, it doesn't seem like it matters much in this case?