zlacker

[return to "My AI skeptic friends are all nuts"]
1. ofjcih+21[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:18:27
>>tablet+(OP)
I feel like we get one of these articles that addresses valid AI criticisms with poor arguments every week and at this point I’m ready to write a boilerplate response because I already know what they’re going to say.

Interns don’t cost 20 bucks a month but training users in the specifics of your org is important.

Knowing what is important or pointless comes with understanding the skill set.

◧◩
2. kubb+v3[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:31:18
>>ofjcih+21
There's also the reverse genre: valid criticism of absolutely strawman arguments that nobody makes.
◧◩◪
3. tptace+04[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:34:16
>>kubb+v3
Which of the arguments in this post hasn't occurred on HN in the past month or so?
◧◩◪◨
4. kubb+nr1[view] [source] 2025-06-03 11:00:18
>>tptace+04
"I tried copilot 2 years ago and I didn’t like it."

Great article BTW, it’s amazing that you’re now blaming developers smarter than you for lack of LLM adoption, as if it weren’t enough for the technology to be useful to become widespread.

Try to deal with „an agent takes 3 minutes to make a small transformation to my codebase and it takes me another 5 to figure out why it changed what it did only to realize that it was the wrong approach and redo it by hand, which took another 7 minutes” in your next one.

[go to top]