zlacker

>>gregor+(OP)
Hello Cloudflare, impressive result, I did not think things were this advanced.

Still, legal question where I'd like to be wrong: AFAIK (and IANAL) if I use AI to generate images, I can't attach copyright to it.

But the code here is clearly copyrighted to you.

Is that possible because you manually modify the code?

How does it work in examples like this one where you try to have close to all code generated by AI?

>>Luker8+v52
Did you check the latest documents from copyright.gov? They’re interesting exactly because of what you’re saying

>>dvrp+i72
I did not, especially seeing as I am not from the USA, so I'd like to have the point of view of a multinational company

--edit: didn't the same office have a controversy a few weeks ago where AI training was almost declared not-fair-use, and the boss was fired on the spot byt the administration, or something like that?

Things sounds confusing to me, which is why I'm asking