zlacker

[return to "My AI skeptic friends are all nuts"]
1. slg+F9[view] [source] 2025-06-02 22:07:12
>>tablet+(OP)
>We imagine artists spending their working hours pushing the limits of expression. But the median artist isn’t producing gallery pieces. They produce on brief: turning out competent illustrations and compositions for magazine covers, museum displays, motion graphics, and game assets.

One of the more eye-opening aspects of this technology is finding out how many of my peers seemingly have no understanding or respect for the concept of art.

◧◩
2. simonw+Ic[view] [source] 2025-06-02 22:26:29
>>slg+F9
How do you mean?
◧◩◪
3. slg+kf[view] [source] 2025-06-02 22:41:43
>>simonw+Ic
Whole libraries have been written over millennia about the importance and purpose of art, and that specific quote reduced it all down to nothing more than the creation of a product with a specific and mundane function as part of some other product. I genuinely feel bad for people with that mindset towards art.
◧◩◪◨
4. wiseow+KZ[view] [source] 2025-06-03 06:11:46
>>slg+kf
Nobody talks about art that survived millennia.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. debugn+Q31[view] [source] 2025-06-03 06:50:37
>>wiseow+KZ
Never been to an archeological museum? There's a couple just in my city, they definitely show art that survived millennia.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. wiseow+J41[view] [source] 2025-06-03 07:00:45
>>debugn+Q31
Not sure what you’re talking about specifically.

My point is that nobody argues that AI replaces art that survived millennia.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. debugn+961[view] [source] 2025-06-03 07:17:50
>>wiseow+J41
Neither did the comment you first replied to, so I probably read your reply differently than you intended.
[go to top]