zlacker

>>tablet+(OP)
Curious how he reconciles this:

> If you build something with an LLM that people will depend on, read the code. In fact, you’ll probably do more than that. You’ll spend 5-10 minutes knocking it back into your own style.

with Joel Spolsky's fundamental maxim:

> It’s harder to read code than to write it.

https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2000/04/06/things-you-should-...

>>nostra+Ed
I'm sure no one reads LLM-produced code very carefully, especially if it "works". At best they skim.

>>pyb+4p
I read LLM generated code like I review a PR. I skim for anything that stands out as a common pitfall, and dig into the details of area I expect issues.