zlacker

[return to "My AI skeptic friends are all nuts"]
1. fellow+52[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:24:37
>>tablet+(OP)
I think the hardest part is not spending the next 3 months of my life in a cave finishing all the hobby/side projects I didn't quite get across the line.

It really does feel like I've gone from being 1 senior engineer to a team that has a 0.8 Sr. Eng, 5 Jrs. and one dude that spends all his time on digging through poorly documented open source projects and documenting them for the team.

Sure I can't spend quite as much time working on hard problems as I used to, but no one knows that I haven't talked to a PM in months, no one knows I haven't written a commit summary in months, it's just been my AI doppelgangers. Compared to myself a year ago I think I now PERSONALLY write 150% more HARD code than I did before. So maybe, my first statement about being 0.8 is false.

I think of it like electric bikes, there seems to be indication that people with electric assist bikes actually burn more calories/spend more time/go farther on an electric bike than those who have manual bikes https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S22141....

◧◩
2. halpow+Q2[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:28:09
>>fellow+52
> I haven't written a commit summary in months

I don't know what you're posting, but if it's anything like what I see being done by GitHub copilot, your commit messages are junk. They're equivalent to this and you're wasting everyone's time:

    // Sets the value
    const value = "red"
◧◩◪
3. fullst+34[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:34:27
>>halpow+Q2
this behaviour is literally removable with proper prompting.

this is a strawmans argument... of whatever your are arguing

◧◩◪◨
4. halpow+Yw[view] [source] 2025-06-03 00:57:07
>>fullst+34
You can't "remove" how LLMs describe changes. I'm not talking about useless comments, I was just saying that they describe changes the same way as they comment code.
[go to top]