zlacker

>>tablet+(OP)
> If you were trying and failing to use an LLM for code 6 months ago, you’re not doing what most serious LLM-assisted coders are doing.

This sounds like the "No true Scotsman" fallacy.

> People coding with LLMs today use agents. Agents get to poke around your codebase on their own.

That's a nonstarter for closed source, unless everything is running on-device, which I don't think it is?

> Part of being a senior developer is making less-able coders productive

Speak for yourself. It's not my job.

>>lapcat+ng
You can run the agents on your own infrastructure (all the way down to a Mac Mini sitting on your desk), or Microsoft, OpenAI and I'm pretty sure Anthropic can sell you an Enterprise service that guarantees a certain level of confidentiality. I work in aerospace, one of the most paranoid industries, and even we got a Copilot subscription that met our needs...

>>haiku2+1s
> You can run the agents on your own infrastructure (all the way down to a Mac Mini sitting on your desk)

How does that work exactly? Do you have a link?

> Microsoft, OpenAI and I'm pretty sure Anthropic can sell you an Enterprise service that guarantees a certain level of confidentiality

These companies hoovered up all of our content without notice, permission, or compensation, to train their models. I wouldn't trust them one bit. My personal opinion is that it's foolish to trust them.

> I work in aerospace, one of the most paranoid industries

Paranoid about what exactly?