zlacker

[return to "My AI skeptic friends are all nuts"]
1. gdubs+Z[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:18:21
>>tablet+(OP)
One thing that I find truly amazing is just the simple fact that you can now be fuzzy with the input you give a computer, and get something meaningful in return. Like, as someone who grew up learning to code in the 90s it always seemed like science fiction that we'd get to a point where you could give a computer some vague human level instructions and get it more or less do what you want.
◧◩
2. csalle+z1[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:22:05
>>gdubs+Z
It's mind blowing. At least 1-2x/week I find myself shocked that this is the reality we live in
◧◩◪
3. malfis+Y5[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:45:03
>>csalle+z1
Today I had a dentist appointment and the dentist suggested I switch toothpaste lines to see if something else works for my sensitivity better.

I am predisposed to canker sores and if I use a toothpaste with SLS in it I'll get them. But a lot of the SLS free toothpastes are new age hippy stuff and is also fluoride free.

I went to chatgpt and asked it to suggest a toothpaste that was both SLS free and had fluoride. Pretty simple ask right?

It came back with two suggestions. It's top suggestion had SLS, it's backup suggestion lacked fluoride.

Yes, it is mind blowing the world we live in. Executives want to turn our code bases over to these tools

◧◩◪◨
4. sneak+07[view] [source] 2025-06-02 21:50:22
>>malfis+Y5
“an LLM made a mistake once, that’s why I don’t use it to code” is exactly the kind of irrelevant FUD that TFA is railing against.

Anyone not learning to use these tools well (and cope with and work around their limitations) is going to be left in the dust in months, perhaps weeks. It’s insane how much utility they have.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. breule+u8[view] [source] 2025-06-02 22:00:04
>>sneak+07
They won't. The speed at which these models evolve is a double-edged sword: they give you value quickly... but any experience you gain dealing with them also becomes obsolete quickly. One year of experience using agents won't be more valuable than one week of experience using them. No one's going to be left in the dust because no one is more than a few weeks away from catching up.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. kossTK+Cj[view] [source] 2025-06-02 23:08:58
>>breule+u8
Very important point, but there's also the sheer amount of reading you have to do, the inevitable scope creep, gargantuan walls text going back and fourth making you "skip" constantly, looking here then there, copying, pasting, erasing, reasking.

Literally the opposite of focus, flow, seeing the big picture.

At least for me to some degree. There's value there as i'm already using these tools everyday but it also seems like a tradeoff i'm not really sure how valuable is yet. Especially with competition upping the noise too.

I feel SO unfocused with these tools and i hate it, it's stressful and feels less "grounded", "tactile" and enjoyable.

I've found myself in a new weird workflowloop a few times with these tools mindlessly iterating on some stupid error the LLM keeps not fixing, while my mind simply refuses to just fix it myself way faster with a little more effort and that's a honestly a bit frightening.

[go to top]