zlacker

>>tablet+(OP)
I feel like we get one of these articles that addresses valid AI criticisms with poor arguments every week and at this point I’m ready to write a boilerplate response because I already know what they’re going to say.

Interns don’t cost 20 bucks a month but training users in the specifics of your org is important.

Knowing what is important or pointless comes with understanding the skill set.

>>ofjcih+21
> with poor arguments every week

This roughly matches my experience too, but I don't think it applies to this one. It has a few novel things that were new ideas to me and I'm glad I read it.

> I’m ready to write a boilerplate response because I already know what they’re going to say

If you have one that addresses what this one talks about I'd be interested in reading it.

>>briand+w2
>> with poor arguments every week

>This roughly matches my experience too, but I don't think it applies to this one.

I'm not so sure. The argument that any good programming language would inherently eliminate the concern for hallucinations seems like a pretty weak argument to me.

>>slg+L8
It’s a confusing one for sure.

To be honest I’m not sure where the logic for that claim comes from. Maybe an abundance of documentation is the assumption?

Either way, being dismissive of one of LLMs major flaws and blaming it on the language doesn’t seem like the way to make that argument.