zlacker

[return to "Cloudlflare builds OAuth with Claude and publishes all the prompts"]
1. paxys+A6[view] [source] 2025-06-02 15:04:53
>>gregor+(OP)
This is exactly the direction I expect AI-assisted coding to go in. Not software engineers being kicked out and some business person pressing a few buttons to have a fully functional app (as is playing out in a lot of fantasies on LinkedIn & X), but rather experienced engineers using AI to generate bits of code and then meticulously reviewing and testing them.

The million dollar (perhaps literally) question is – could @kentonv have written this library quicker by himself without any AI help?

◧◩
2. gokhan+na[view] [source] 2025-06-02 15:23:43
>>paxys+A6
> Not software engineers being kicked out ... but rather experienced engineers using AI to generate bits of code and then meticulously reviewing and testing them.

But what if you only need 2 kentonv's instead of 20 at the end? Do you assume we'll find enough new tasks that will occupy the other 18? I think that's the question.

And the author is implementing a fairly technical project in this case. How about routine LoB app development?

◧◩◪
3. paxys+5b[view] [source] 2025-06-02 15:27:13
>>gokhan+na
Increased productivity means increased opportuntity. There isn't going to be a time (at least not anytime soon) when we can all sit back and say "yup, we have accomplished everything there is to do with software and don't need more engineers".
◧◩◪◨
4. spider+4c[view] [source] 2025-06-02 15:34:23
>>paxys+5b
But there very well might be a time very soon where human's no longer offer economic value to the software engineering process. If you could (and currently you can't) pay an AI $10k/year to do what a human could do in a year, why would you pay the human 6 figures? Or even $20k?

Nobody is claiming that human's won't have jobs simply because "we have accomplished everything this is to do". It's that humans will offer zero economic value compared to AI because AI gets so good and so cheap.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. paxys+Dc[view] [source] 2025-06-02 15:37:23
>>spider+4c
And there might be a giant asteroid that strikes the earth a few years down the line ending human civilization.

If there is some magic $10k AI that can fully replace a $200k software engineer then I'd love to see it. Until that happens this entire discussion is science fiction.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. spider+2f[view] [source] 2025-06-02 15:51:20
>>paxys+Dc
If experts were saying the astroid will hit earth in the next 5 years, would it still be science fiction?

You acting like those two scenarios are the same is disingenuous. Fuck that.

[go to top]