zlacker

[return to "Cloudlflare builds OAuth with Claude and publishes all the prompts"]
1. mtlync+57[view] [source] 2025-06-02 15:07:09
>>gregor+(OP)
>In all seriousness, two months ago (January 2025), I (@kentonv) would have agreed.

I'm confused by "I (@kentonv)" means here because kentonv is a different user.[0] Are you saying this is your alt? Or is this a typo/misunderstanding?

Edit: Figured out that most of your post is quoting the README. Consider using > and * characters to clarify.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=kentonv

◧◩
2. kenton+r7[view] [source] 2025-06-02 15:09:01
>>mtlync+57
He is quoting from the project readme. I wrote all this text.
◧◩◪
3. mdanie+Y7[view] [source] 2025-06-02 15:11:21
>>kenton+r7
Thanks for weighing in here

If I might make a suggestion, based on how fast things change, even within a model family, you may benefit from saying Claude what. I was especially cognizant of this given the recent v4 release which (of course) hailed as the second coming. Regardless, you may want to update your readme to say

It may also be wildly out of scope for including in a project's readme, but knowing which of the bazillions of coding tools you used would also help a tiny bit with this reproduction crises found in every single one of these style threads

◧◩◪◨
4. diggan+l8[view] [source] 2025-06-02 15:13:49
>>mdanie+Y7
> It may also be wildly out of scope for including in a project's readme

The entire point of the repository seems to be to invalidate/validate the thesis if LLMs are good enough to be pair programmers right now. Removing it from the README makes no sense in that context.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. kenton+7a[view] [source] 2025-06-02 15:22:51
>>diggan+l8
This library is a core component of our MCP framework, it's not just an experiment.
[go to top]