zlacker

>>mef+(OP)
Chomsky’s notion is: LLMs can only imitate, not understand language. But what exactly is understanding? What if our „understanding“ is just unlocking another level in a model? Unlocking a new form of generation?

>>submet+25
> But what exactly is understanding?

I would say that it is to what extent your mental model of a certain system is able to make accurate predictions of that system's behavior.