>>nyrikk+(OP)
Man that "Unreasonable Effectiveness of ..." pattern is getting a bit overused. With the original paper [1] you could still say that there really is some deeply philosophical mystery. But they now slap that on everything.
>>ngruhn+0o
Engineering blogger's love of parroting the titles of famous papers/articles (unreasonable effectiveness..., all you need is..., ... Considered harmful, etc) has always been lightly annoying to me
>>gipp+VD
With software engineering, every single thing in the 2010s had "syntactic sugar" and "sane defaults". I still get a slight blood pressure spike whenever someone uses either of those terms.