zlacker

>>blueri+(OP)
It is refreshing to see I am not the only person who cannot get LLMs to say anything valuable. I have tried several times, but the cycle "You're right to question this. I actually didn't do anything you asked for. Here is some more garbage!" gets really old really fast.

It makes me wonder whether everyone else is kidding themselves, or if I'm just holding it wrong.

>>danlit+ag
Can you give some examples where it didn't work for you? I'm curious because I derive a lot of value from it and my guess is that we're trying very different things with it.

>>terhec+dj
Every single thing that I am interested in my computer doing has not been done before by anyone that I know of nor do I think anyone besides myself would care.

I keep reading all of this glazing like in the rest of the thread and it's really frustrating because you get this fatigue with all the bs coming out of them that makes you not want to use them at all. The more you try to get it to fix the output the more it uses unrelated tokens.

In just the last 24 hours I've seen multiple models:

- Put C++ code structures in Python - Synthesize non existent functions, libraries, features of programming languages - Whole features of video file formats and associated ffmpeg flags that aren't applicable to imagery.

I also think you're not going to get any good answers to this question and a lot of pro AI people are going to be left unsatisfied because when you get into this spot every single thing that it does is wrong in some new way that cannot be easily categorized.

It is literally the limit of the representation of information in a digital way.