zlacker

>>blueri+(OP)
It is refreshing to see I am not the only person who cannot get LLMs to say anything valuable. I have tried several times, but the cycle "You're right to question this. I actually didn't do anything you asked for. Here is some more garbage!" gets really old really fast.

It makes me wonder whether everyone else is kidding themselves, or if I'm just holding it wrong.

>>danlit+ag
I do machine learning research and it is very useful for working out equations and checking for ”does this concept already have an established name” etc.

It is also excellent for writing one-off code experiments and plots, saving some time from having to write them from scratch.

I’m sorry but you are just using it wrong.

>>tsurba+Gh
I personally find your use cases to be the same as mine for AI, along with "fancy autocomplete" in larger files...however it's a fairly disappointingly limited use compared to the "it's nearly AGI" vision companies are selling.

The code it also generates is...questionable, and I'm a pretty middling dev.