zlacker

>>laiysb+(OP)
Replace the AI agent with any other new technology and this is an example of a company:

1. Working out in the open

2. Dogfooding their own product

3. Pushing the state of the art

Given that the negative impact here falls mostly (completely?) on the Microsoft team which opted into this, is there any reason why we shouldn't be supporting progress here?

>>robotc+Pn
"Pushing the state of the art" and experimenting on a critical software development framework is probably not the best idea.

>>throwa+os
Why not, when it goes through code review by experienced software engineers who are experts on the subject in a codebase that is covered by extensive unit tests?