zlacker

>>laiysb+(OP)
Replace the AI agent with any other new technology and this is an example of a company:

1. Working out in the open

2. Dogfooding their own product

3. Pushing the state of the art

Given that the negative impact here falls mostly (completely?) on the Microsoft team which opted into this, is there any reason why we shouldn't be supporting progress here?

>>robotc+Pn
Who is "we" and how and why would "we" "support" or not "support" anything.

Personally I just think it is funny that MS is soft launching a product into total failure.