zlacker

[return to "Dilbert creator Scott Adams says he will die soon from same cancer as Joe Biden"]
1. deepsu+oH1[view] [source] 2025-05-20 06:38:04
>>dale_h+(OP)
A lot of comments here mention his comics or his controversial pro-Trump opinions in the last 10 years, but I would like to emphasize and point out his influence he had over the lifes of so many people with his life strategies and explanations, microlessons, memes and ways to look at the world. Like

* systems over goals: the theory that you shouldn't set yourself specific goals, but instead just find a system how to work towards your goals regularly

* talent stacks: the theory that, in order to succeed in life, you don't need to be the best in one skill, but good enough in a useful combination of several skills that can be used together

* the idea that managing your energy is more important than managing your time

* the Adams rule of slow moving disasters: any kind of disaster that takes many years to manifest can be overcome by humanity. Scary are those disasters that don't give you enough time to react.

* rewiring your brain: that by finding the right way to look at something, you can modify your own behavior. He wrote a whole book full of recipes to change your behavior and feelings.

* despite not listening to Rap, a long time ago when Kanye West had one of his first successful songs, someone sent Adams the lyrics to some song and by looking at the lyrics Adams recognized West as a unique genius

* you should never trust a video as proof of anything, if you can't see what happened before or after. It's most likely taken out of context. Just like most quotes are worthless without context.

* "perception is reality": that how someone perceives a fact is more important than what actually happened

* "simultaneous realities": realities are shaped by how people perceive them. And two people can disagree on something, while both are right at the same time, because they view the same thing through two different lenses and thus live in different realities.

* TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome): the observation that many people hate Trump so much that they lose the capability of rational thought and either just shut their brain down when talking about anything related to Trump, or want to do the opposite of what Trump wants

* "word-thinking": when someone find labels for things or people, and then forms opinions based on the label

* detecting cognitive dissonance: when someone just shuts down their brain because the experienced reality doesn't match their expectation

* "tells for lies", like analyzing people on TV and looking for clues that they lie

* coining the term "fine people hoax" for a video snippet that was constantly repeated on media to show Trump having one opinion, even though when watching the whole video it was clear that he meant the opposite.

* "logic doesn't win arguments", the rules of persuasion, and the theory of 'master persuaders'

* he predicted Trump winning the 2016 election when Trump had just announced his campaign, long before the primaries, because he recognized a 'master persuader' in him.

And there are probably many more things I don't remember right now, but his books and blog shaped my way of thinking, and I am using his way of looking at the world every day.

I must admit I didn't really follow 'Coffee with Scott Adams' - I think he kind of jumped the shark when having to fill at least 30 minutes every day, and I am not that interested in politics. But that doesn't diminish his accomplishments.

◧◩
2. Sohcah+403[view] [source] 2025-05-20 16:36:40
>>deepsu+oH1
> TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome)

I've always thought the definition of TDS was completely backwards. I've too often seen legitimate criticisms of Trump deflected with claims of TDS. Certainly it's the zealous cult-like worshipping of Trump that's deranged.

https://imgur.com/a/n1MjXxI

◧◩◪
3. deepsu+v73[view] [source] 2025-05-20 17:32:59
>>Sohcah+403
It can certainly also be used the other way round by people who defend Trump no matter what. But I have seen enough people who clearly weren't even able to discuss Trump's policy because the thought that Trump could be right about anything was unacceptable to them. And often that thought caused a very emotional reaction.
[go to top]