zlacker

[return to "Perverse incentives of vibe coding"]
1. brooke+Hm[view] [source] 2025-05-14 22:11:26
>>laurex+(OP)
I don't understand the productivity that people get out of these AI tools. I've tried it and I just can't get anything remotely worthwhile unless it's something very simple or something completely new being built from the ground up.

Like sure, I can ask claude to give me the barebones of a web service that does some simple task. Or a webpage with some information on it.

But any time I've tried to get AI services to help with bugfixing/feature development on a large, complex, potentially multi-language codebase, it's useless.

And those tasks are the ones that actually take up the majority of my time. On the occasion that I'm spinning a new thing up quickly, I don't really need an AI to do it for me -- I mean, that's the easy part!

Is there something I'm missing? Am I just not using it right? I keep seeing people talk about how addictive it is, how the productivity boost is insane, how all their code is now written by AI and then audited, and I just don't see how that's possible outside of really simple rote programming.

◧◩
2. slurpy+Kn[view] [source] 2025-05-14 22:20:40
>>brooke+Hm
You are not alone! I strongly agree and I feel like I am losing my mind reading some of the comments people have about these services.
◧◩◪
3. Schema+QN[view] [source] 2025-05-15 02:59:26
>>slurpy+Kn
I swear the people posting this stuff are just building todo list tier apps from scratch. On even the most moderately large codebase it completely breaks down.
[go to top]