zlacker

[return to "Perverse incentives of vibe coding"]
1. biker1+a8[view] [source] 2025-05-14 20:27:57
>>laurex+(OP)
Can we please stop using 'vibe coding' to mean 'ai assisted coding'?? (best breakdown, imo: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Mar/19/vibe-coding/)

Is it really vibe coding if you are building a detailed coding plan, conducting "git-based experimentation with ruthless pruning", and essentially reviewing the code incrementally for correctness and conciseness? Sure, it's a process dependent on AI, but it's very far from nearly "forget[ing] that the code even exists".

That all said, I do think the article captures some of the current cost/quality dilemmas. I wouldn't jump to conclusions that these incentives are actually driving most current training decisions, but it's an interesting area to highlight.

◧◩
2. Animat+59[view] [source] 2025-05-14 20:35:19
>>biker1+a8
"Vibe coding" is a trend.[1]

[1] https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?geo=US&q=%22vibe%20...

[go to top]