zlacker

>>meetpa+(OP)
I truly do not understand how people are getting worthwhile results from Gemini 2.5 Pro. I have used all of the major models for lots of different programming tasks and I have never once had Gemini produce something useful. It's not just wrong, it's laughably bad. And people are making claims that it's the best. I just... don't... get it.

>>mvdtnz+lF
That's weird. What languages/frameworks/tasks are you using it for? I've been using Gemini 2.5 with Dart recently and it frequently produces indisputably useful code, and indisputably helpful advice. Along with some code that's pretty dumb or misguided, and some advice that would be counterproductive if I actually followed it. But "never once had Gemini produce something useful" is wildly different from my recent experience.

>>WaltPu+ja1
Plain JS with Alpine.js, Java with Spring Boot, Webflux and Netty. Flyway, Tailwind. Here's an example conversation. It claims it made a mistake (there was no mistake) then spits out pathetically unusable code,

* Takes the first player's score, not the current player * Stores it as a high score without even checking if it's higher than the current high score * Stores high scores on a per-lobby basis against the given instructions * Does NOT store high scores on a per-configuration basis as instructed

https://g.co/gemini/share/baafa0e89c3a