zlacker

[return to "Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview"]
1. segpha+J4[view] [source] 2025-05-06 15:34:48
>>meetpa+(OP)
My frustration with using these models for programming in the past has largely been around their tendency to hallucinate APIs that simply don't exist. The Gemini 2.5 models, both pro and flash, seem significantly less susceptible to this than any other model I've tried.

There are still significant limitations, no amount of prompting will get current models to approach abstraction and architecture the way a person does. But I'm finding that these Gemini models are finally able to replace searches and stackoverflow for a lot of my day-to-day programming.

◧◩
2. jstumm+jH[view] [source] 2025-05-06 19:23:17
>>segpha+J4
> no amount of prompting will get current models to approach abstraction and architecture the way a person does

I find this sentiment increasingly worrisome. It's entirely clear that every last human will be beaten on code design in the upcoming years (I am not going to argue if it's 1 or 5 years away, who cares?)

I wished people would just stop holding on to what amounts to nothing, and think and talk more about what can be done in a new world. We need good ideas and I think this could be a place to advance them.

◧◩◪
3. DanHul+2P[view] [source] 2025-05-06 20:14:54
>>jstumm+jH
> It's entirely clear that every last human will be beaten on code design in the upcoming years

Citation needed. In fact, I think this pretty clearly hits the "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" bar.

◧◩◪◨
4. Arthur+OG1[view] [source] 2025-05-07 05:25:33
>>DanHul+2P
Beating humans isnt really what matters. Its enabling developers to design who cant.

Last month I had a staff member design and build a distributed system that would be far beyond their capabilities without AI assistance. As a business owner this allows me to reduce the dependency and power of the senior devs.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. auggie+TH1[view] [source] 2025-05-07 05:42:27
>>Arthur+OG1
Hehe, have fun with that distributed system down the line.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Arthur+zJ1[view] [source] 2025-05-07 06:06:35
>>auggie+TH1
Why? We fully checked the design, what he built, and it was fully tested over weeks for security and stability.

Don't parrot what you read online that these systems are unable do this stuff. It's from the clueless or devs coping. Not only are they capable but theyre improving by the month.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. goatlo+ZK1[view] [source] 2025-05-07 06:24:19
>>Arthur+zJ1
I can't tell on this site who has genuinely experienced radical changes in software development from dedicated LLM usage, and who is trying to sell something. But given previous hype cycles with all exciting new tech at the time, including past iterations of AI, I tend to believe it's more in the trying to sell something camp.
[go to top]