zlacker

>>bondar+(OP)
> It’s odd for there to be such an easily-removable design flaw in the human body; evolution tends to remove them.

I wouldn't say so at all. Poor eyesight carries on smartly. Baldness. I enjoy both.

But an old story about the controller code for a surface-to-air missile comes to mind.

Someone looking at the memory allocator spots an obvious resource leak: "This code is going to crash."

The reply was that, while the point was theoretically valid, it was irrelevant, since the system itself would detonate long before resource exhaustion became an issue.

So too prostate cancer back in the day: war, famine and plague were keeping the lifespan well below the threshold of every man's time bomb.

>>smitty+Q7
There's also your back, your joints, your teeth, GERD. Everything starts getting flimsy in your late forties.

>>forint+j8
It would probably take too long, but a human breeding program centered around the healthiest still fertile old men we can find and young women with spotless genetic heritage would uplift our whole species.

>>Traube+L9
Older fathers increase the chance of autism, schizophrenia et al.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternal_age_effect

>>lostlo+va
Obviously you would use sperm harvested while they were still young, and kept frozen for 60 years.

>>meindn+Pc
But then you wouldn't necessarily know that their current sperm is valuable.

A better method would be to confine the program to monozygotic twin pairs of young women with spotless genetic heritage, and inseminate one twin with frozen sperm and the other with current sperm. The "current sperm" child (CS) could be closely monitored, and the "frozen sperm" (FS) child fitted with an explosive chastity device which, in the event that CS is found to have developmental issues, are remotely-detonated to ensure the tainted line does not persist.

Simple-as.