zlacker

[return to "App.net funded with $500,000."]
◧
1. dkrich+J1[view] [source] 2012-08-12 18:01:11
>>aculve+(OP)
I'm not really sure what the purpose of this service is. Could somebody please explain? I'm not trying to be a dick. I myself wouldn't pay to use Facebook minus the ads. I barely use it as it is. I only pay for things that provide me with some utility. The description of "a paid, real-time social feed" is vague and ambiguous.
◧◩
2. achomp+s2[view] [source] 2012-08-12 18:13:18
>>dkrich+J1
I'm not really sure what the purpose of this service is. ... I myself wouldn't pay to use Facebook minus the ads.

You answered your own question above, and also identified why app.net won't interest you. If you're okay with ads, then I think you'd get zero utility from app.net

◧◩◪
3. rubash+lg[view] [source] 2012-08-12 23:44:58
>>achomp+s2
As I read your post I realized app.net is probably for me.

It's like lower Manhattan or parts of San Francisco. People who think the rents are ridiculous shouldn't live there anyway; it's not for them.

◧◩◪◨
4. tripzi+kL[view] [source] 2012-08-13 14:06:15
>>rubash+lg
Thanks for your honesty. This is what a lot of people here seem to be thinking but don't dare to say out loud: Twitter without the "little people". Because you're worth it!
[go to top]