zlacker

[return to "App.net funded with $500,000."]
1. jtokop+O[view] [source] 2012-08-12 17:44:04
>>aculve+(OP)
Not that I'm accusing Dalton of doing this, but when croudfunding without using a platform like kickstarter, it might be too easy to fake backer numbers in order to meet the goal or inflate popularity.

What this means for the future: Companies will announce croudfunding and then fake amazing numbers in order to appear popular and gain lots of press.

I can see the headline now: "ACME Software raises $3 million in first 24 hours!" Actual funds raised: $250.

◧◩
2. citric+41[view] [source] 2012-08-12 17:48:02
>>jtokop+O
It's an interesting point, if you look at the video statistics it has only had 31,000 plays which means for every 4 people that watch the video at least 1 spends $50. However, Stripe has access to their payment info so it's possible to prove whether or not this is faked.

Actually, that's an interesting question: would it be fraud to fake the last $xxx,xxx of a crowd sourcing drive?

◧◩◪
3. Samuel+e2[view] [source] 2012-08-12 18:08:35
>>citric+41
I backed the project without watching the video. The posts on sites like DaringFireball and Marco.org had already convinced me. I doubt I'm the only one.
◧◩◪◨
4. guscos+hj[view] [source] 2012-08-13 01:13:47
>>Samuel+e2
Same here.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. 0ptr+iz[view] [source] 2012-08-13 10:04:40
>>guscos+hj
AFAIK Vimeo calculates only fully watched videos, so it's 30000 viewers who watched the video to the end.
[go to top]