zlacker

[return to "App.net funded with $500,000."]
1. dj2ste+K1[view] [source] 2012-08-12 18:01:14
>>aculve+(OP)
A centralized social network is what's wrong. Despite their best intentions they're still going to have all their users and developers by the balls. This absolutely will not replace Facebook or Twitter, it'll be just another one of the dozens of copycats like Path.

What really needs to happen is an open decentralized protocol needs to be agreed upon for newsfeeds + blog posts (wordpress) + microblog (twitter). Then everyone can write their own servers and clients and operate in a manner like Email currently works.

◧◩
2. unimpr+12[view] [source] 2012-08-12 18:05:12
>>dj2ste+K1
> What really needs to happen is an open decentralized protocol needs to be agreed upon for newsfeeds + blog posts (wordpress) + microblog (twitter). Then everyone can write their own servers and clients and operate in a manner like Email currently works.

Then do it. Make everyone look like idiots for not doing it sooner. Make it so cool I have to sign up.

◧◩◪
3. dj2ste+s3[view] [source] 2012-08-12 18:36:06
>>unimpr+12
Oh I've definitely been thinking about it. One big problem is it wouldn't be nearly as lucrative as other potential project ideas -- it simply won't be possible to build another $100B Facebook style corporation around a social network. Diaspora was kind of onto the right idea but I think they completely chose the wrong technology stack and are now stuck in the mud without any momentum.
◧◩◪◨
4. encode+54[view] [source] 2012-08-12 18:57:28
>>dj2ste+s3
You think it was the technology stack and not just that users and developers were disinterested?

As a developer, I never thought once about building an app or integration for Diaspora.

That's why App.Net might have a chance -- he's making this about targeting developers. There's a reason Apple has spent millions marketing different 3rd party apps -- and the whole ecosystem via "there's an app for that". There's a reason "killer app" is part of our lexicon. There's a reason Steve Ballmer jumped around on stage screaming 'Developers!' and there's a reason XCode is free now.

Building it is not a guarantee that they will come. But it is a prerequisite.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. objclx+Uf[view] [source] 2012-08-12 23:33:00
>>encode+54
Slightly OT, but since you mentioned it:

> "there's a reason XCode is free now"

...I think anyone who has used XCode 4 for any substantial project would probably say the reason XCode is free is because charging for it would be adding insult to injury.

[go to top]