zlacker

[return to "Obituary for Cyc"]
1. Rochus+zu[view] [source] 2025-04-08 23:10:14
>>todsac+(OP)
A very interesting and worthwhile article (better than the comments here would suggest). However, I find it a bit of a pity that the author places so much emphasis on the assumption that the project has failed. The approach has not simply failed because the search for a solution has been going on for forty years. It took even more than forty years and costed at least as much before neural networks became really useful, and nobody would claim that the project failed because of that. And today's LLM are not really that intelligent yet. Maybe Cycorp's knowledge base will be made generally accessible at some point, so that it can be used to train LLMs. Perhaps then a greater benefit of this data will become apparent.
◧◩
2. smoyer+rv[view] [source] 2025-04-08 23:19:03
>>Rochus+zu
> on the assumption the project has failed.

My daughter's PhD thesis was largely negative results. Even if the project had failed, we could learn from it if it wasn't so secretive. It could be much more open without being OSS!

◧◩◪
3. YeGobl+Qm1[view] [source] 2025-04-09 10:47:57
>>smoyer+rv
>> My daughter's PhD thesis was largely negative results.

Well, give us a link man! :)

◧◩◪◨
4. smoyer+oG3[view] [source] 2025-04-10 01:04:00
>>YeGobl+Qm1
You're forcing the proud dad function: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36995257/
[go to top]